A formative evaluation of a college preparation program based on a model of the attributes of effective programs and a preliminary explanation of the program's impact on student participants [electronic resource]
說明
117 p
附註
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-08, Section: A, page: 2804
Supervisor: Jacob O. Stampen
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2003
This study evaluated a college preparation program for students from under-represented groups in higher education to help the program staff improve its effectiveness and increase positive impact on student participants. The program's effectiveness and its impact were evaluated based on an evaluation model (Umbrella Model) that was developed by synthesizing the literature, and the model generated components that are known to be effective. The model also was used as the conceptual framework for this study, especially to emphasize the needs of the student participants
Two research questions were asked: (1) To what extent does the program reflect the components of the Umbrella Model for college preparation programs that are known to be effective? (2) What is the impact of the program on participating students? To answer these questions, two survey questionnaires were developed based on the model; one is for students and the other is for teachers and staff. Data were collected from the questionnaires for students and teachers/staff of the program, and analyzed to see the program's implementation of the components of the model and impact on student participants
The analyses show that, overall, the evaluated program has successfully implemented most components of the Umbrella Model, but with a few exceptions. There are a few components that the program needs to improve or develop including parental encouragement and involvement, students' academic preparation, saliency of sponsoring institution, and having a mentor program
In addition to the findings, recommendations were made for program practice including better communication between teachers and staff, program evaluation by students, and a more respectful attitude of the program staff members toward research
