MARC 主機 00000nam a2200349   4500 
001    AAI10117225 
005    20161128143928.5 
008    161128s2016    ||||||||s|||||||| ||eng d 
020    9781339786285 
035    (MiAaPQ)AAI10117225 
040    MiAaPQ|cMiAaPQ 
100 1  Krizman, Jennifer 
245 10 Influence of Second Language Experience on Auditory 
       Processing in Adolescents: Consequences for Real-World 
       Listening 
300    202 p 
500    Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-
       10(E), Section: B 
500    Adviser: Nina Kraus 
502    Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northwestern University, 2016 
520    The sounds of our lives, including the sounds of our 
       language, serve as a training ground that engenders neural
       plasticity. Experience with more than one language 
       facilitates plasticity beyond that seen in monolinguals, 
       shaping cognitive processes that support juggling two 
       languages in one mind, with the most notable enhancement 
       seen for focusing on relevant, and ignoring irrelevant, 
       information, a process known as inhibitory control. During
       communication, cognitive and sensory systems interact, 
       making it unlikely that this additional bilingual 
       plasticity is merely within the purview of cognitive 
       systems, but rather is evident in sensory systems as well.
       This dissertation is built on the hypothesis, tested 
       across five studies, that bilingualism is a form of 
       enrichment that induces plasticity in those auditory 
       processes that interact with cognitive function during 
       real-world communication. The first two studies, which 
       tested subcortical evoked responses in adolescents, asked 
       if bilinguals and monolinguals differed in their sensory 
       encoding. Bilinguals had larger responses to the pitch of 
       speech syllables that tracked with their greater 
       inhibitory control abilities. The third study asked 
       whether bilingual experience drives these sensory 
       enhancements. Subcortical pitch encoding was found to be 
       stronger in children who had more bilingual experience, 
       suggesting this plasticity resulted from experience rather
       than pre-existing differences. Though these three studies 
       used speech syllables that lacked the complexity of real-
       world communication, the studies confirm bilingual 
       auditory-processing enhancements and establish their 
       tethering to cognitive processes important for 
       communication. Interestingly, while these findings 
       highlight the potential for bilingual plasticity to 
       facilitate real-world listening, previous literature has 
       found bilinguals to struggle in this realm relative to 
       monolinguals. To understand the interplay between 
       cognitive-sensory advantages and real-world listening 
       disadvantages, the next study compared bilingual and 
       monolingual adolescents on listening-in-noise tests that 
       differed in linguistic complexity. Bilinguals showed an 
       advantage when the targets were tones; monolinguals 
       outperformed bilinguals when stimuli were sentences. The 
       observed performance shift highlights how bilingual 
       experience can engender plasticity that leads to both 
       advantages and disadvantages, which presumably has 
       consequences for real-world communication. Identification 
       of these consequences was the goal of the final study. 
       Auditory selective attention, a fundamental part of 
       everyday communication, involves the very processes found 
       to be enhanced in bilinguals. Bilinguals and monolinguals 
       were compared on this task to yield insights into the 
       consequences of bilingual plasticity for real-world 
       listening. Bilinguals and monolinguals did not differ in 
       performance. Additionally, both bilinguals and 
       monolinguals showed an attention effect on neural 
       processing, in which cortical responses during active 
       listening increased while subcortical responses decreased.
       However, there were differences in the neural and 
       cognitive processes engaged to complete the task. 
       Consistent with the first study, bilinguals showed greater
       subcortical encoding of the pitch of the stimuli. They 
       also used inhibitory control to complete this task, as 
       evidenced by a correlation between their inhibitory 
       control abilities and task performance. From these results,
       we suggest that bilingualism enhances both cognitive and 
       sensory processes important for real-world listening. 
       Furthermore, this series of studies demonstrates that the 
       bilingual cannot be thought of as the sum of two 
       monolinguals, but rather as a mental juggler of two 
       languages that results in unique obstacles and distinct 
       neuroplasticity 
590    School code: 0163 
650  4 Neurosciences 
650  4 Psychobiology 
650  4 Physiology 
690    0317 
690    0349 
690    0719 
710 2  Northwestern University.|bCommunication Sciences and 
       Disorders 
773 0  |tDissertation Abstracts International|g77-10B(E) 
856 40 |uhttps://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/
       advanced?query=10117225 
912    PQDT 
館藏地索書號條碼處理狀態 

Go to Top