MARC 主機 00000nam  2200000 a 4500 
001    AAINR32309 
005    20080916155632.5 
008    080916s2007    ||||||||s|||||||| ||eng d 
020    9780494323090 
035    (UMI)AAINR32309 
040    UMI|cUMI 
100 1  Manjikian, Sevak 
245 10 Islamic law in Canada: Marriage and divorce|h[electronic 
       resource] 
300    284 p 
500    Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-
       10, Section: A, page: 4392 
502    Thesis (Ph.D.)--McGill University (Canada), 2007 
520    Islamic Law in Canada: Marriage and Divorce provides an 
       analysis of how Canadian society and the Canadian judicial
       system have responded to the use of the Shari'a to resolve
       issues relating to Islamic marriage and divorce in Canada.
       This dissertation explores two instances where Canadian 
       society has been forced to address the role of the Shari'a
       in Canada and its interaction with Canadian laws and 
       values. The first involves the debate that took place in 
       Ontario over the last decade concerning the use of Islamic
       arbitration in family matters. This public debate 
       ultimately led to the rejection of faith-based arbitration
       in that province, a decision apparently consistent with 
       traditional Canadian attitudes towards multiculturalism. 
       The second area of interaction between Canadian and 
       Islamic law is within the Canadian court system itself. In
       particular, Canadian judges are occasionally required to 
       grapple with Islamic family law issues when rendering 
       judgments on certain cases that appear before them. This 
       dissertation will examine a number of such cases in order 
       to illustrate how the Shari'a has been addressed by 
       Canadian judges. The overall aim of this work is to 
       situate Islamic law within Canada's liberal framework. It 
       is argued that although Canadians are amenable to certain 
       levels of diversity, values that fall outside mainstream 
       liberalism are not granted recognition. This dissertation 
       will also demonstrate that the failure to legitimize 
       Islamic arbitration represents a lost opportunity that 
       would have broadened the scope of Canadian justice to 
       include minority voices. The decision to reject faith-
       based arbitration will motivate some Muslims to seek 
       justice from ad-hoc bodies of authority. Devoid of 
       government oversight, these forms of underground Islamic 
       justice may negatively affect certain members of Canada's 
       Muslim community 
590    School code: 0781 
650  4 Religion, General 
650  4 Canadian Studies 
650  4 Law 
690    0318 
690    0385 
690    0398 
710 2  McGill University (Canada) 
773 0  |tDissertation Abstracts International|g68-10A 
856 40 |uhttp://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/
       advanced?query=NR32309 
912    PQDT 
館藏地索書號條碼處理狀態 

Go to Top