MARC 主機 00000nam a2200445K 4500
001 AAI28006492
005 20200921070822.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 200921s2020 miu sbm 000 0 eng d
020 9798643183815
035 (MiAaPQ)AAI28006492
035 (MiAaPQ)umichrackham003020
040 MiAaPQ|beng|cMiAaPQ|dNTU
100 1 Gray, Sara Soto
245 10 Environmental Management and Policy Decisions :
|bUnderstanding the Influences on Public Acceptance
264 0 |c2020
300 1 online resource (105 pages)
336 text|btxt|2rdacontent
337 computer|bc|2rdamedia
338 online resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
500 Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-
11, Section: A
500 Advisor: Arvai, Joseph
502 Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2020
504 Includes bibliographical references
520 Public acceptance shapes the implementation of technology,
governance, and policy. Failure to achieve public
acceptance has been expressed by the general public
through lack of consumer acceptance, vilification in the
media, and loss of political popularity. These actions can
harm the realization of a sustainable product, renewable
energies, or environmental policy. Conversely, achieving
public acceptance can result in successes and support. In
the face of global environmental change, innovating and
working towards sustainability goals requires public
acceptance and support as this is an issue that technology
cannot address alone. When attempting to create change on
a global scale the participation and acceptance of
individuals, companies and governments is necessary. This
dissertation contributes to both research and practice by
addressing public acceptance in context of current events.
I evaluate relevant and consequential activities conducted
by individuals, companies, and governments for factors
that affect public acceptance with the intent to improve
understanding of barriers to acceptance. The first section
helps to clarify the public acceptance of individual
environmental behavior by addressing who is willing to
take future action to address issues of global
environmental change. The second section of this
dissertation evaluates responses and acceptance of
corporate sustainability behavior in response to
controversy. The third section focuses on the outcome of
federal policy changes and the impact on public acceptance
533 Electronic reproduction.|bAnn Arbor, Mich. :|cProQuest,
|d2020
538 Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 Environmental studies
650 4 Sustainability
653 Public acceptance
653 Greenwashing
653 Science advisory boards
655 7 Electronic books.|2local
690 0477
690 0640
710 2 ProQuest Information and Learning Co
710 2 University of Michigan.|bResource Policy & Behavior PhD
773 0 |tDissertations Abstracts International|g81-11A
856 40 |uhttps://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/
advanced?query=28006492|zclick for full text (PQDT)
912 PQDT
